Severe Hepatitis Complicating Olmesartan Enteropathy: A Case Report.

Introduction: Olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, is associated with an uncommon complication of enteropathy that presents insidiously, usually months to years after initial commencement of anti-hypertensive therapy which can be dose-dependent. It has a variable spectrum of clinical presentation but commonly presents as a moderate to severe malabsorptive process with potential severe complications related to poor end-organ perfusion. Lymphocytic gastritis and microscopic colitis are often noted in patients presenting with olmesartan-induced enteropathy; however, hepatic involvement has been less frequently observed. Case Presentation: We illustrate a case of a 43-year-old female presenting with 2 weeks of profuse non-bloody diarrhea in the context of olmesartan enteropathy which was complicated by an acute severe ischemic and enteropathic hepatopathy. Conclusion: Our case prompts clinicians to maintain a high index of suspicion in cases presenting with a seronegative enteropathy and concurrent acute liver injury while on olmesartan therapy. Cessation of olmesartan therapy resulted in prompt resolution of diarrheal symptoms and normalization of the acute transaminitis on subsequent three-week follow-up.

Olmesartan-Induced Enteropathy: When the Treatment of One Disease Causes Another.

Olmesartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist used for the management of hypertension. This drug can lead to an enteropathy that clinically and histologically resembles coeliac disease. Symptoms may appear months or years after the introduction of the drug and usually resolve after discontinuation. The authors present a case of an 86-year-old woman with hypertension who was treated with olmesartan for 10 years. She presented to the emergency department with diarrhoea after three months of development and weight loss. The aetiological study that was conducted excluded infectious, inflammatory, endocrinological, and neoplastic causes. The pathological anatomy of the duodenal biopsy was suggestive of coeliac disease, but the serology was not compatible. The patient presented complete remission of the condition with the suspension of the drug and subsequent recrudescence when, by self-initiation, she resumed olmesartan. This case study aims to alert readers of a rare cause of enteropathy with a clinical manifestation that mimics coeliac disease. Olmesartan-induced enteropathy seems to be a diagnosis of exclusion and should be considered in patients chronically medicated with olmesartan.

Non-celiac Enteropathy and Olmesartan: An Essential Consideration.

Emerging evidence has shed light on non-celiac causes of enteropathy in recent years, presenting a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. This study discusses the diagnostic challenges related to non-celiac enteropathy, specifically focusing on olmesartan-induced enteropathy (OIE). A 73-year-old lady presented to the emergency department with a six-month history of watery diarrhea exacerbated by food intake and significant weight loss. The patient at admission was found to be dehydrated with severe hypokalemia and hypocalcemia. The extensive testing that was performed was unremarkable, including celiac disease panel, enteric panel, ova and parasites, Clostridium difficile, fecal calprotectin, and computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis. A significant electrolyte imbalance was corrected at admission, and subsequent upper endoscopy investigation with duodenal biopsies revealed moderate to severe villi blunting with a significant intraepithelial infiltrate of CD3+ lymphocytes. A colonoscopy that was performed at the same time was unremarkable, with negative biopsies for microscopic colitis. Given the suspicion of OIE, olmesartan was discontinued. One-month follow-up revealed resolution of malabsorption, with electrolyte normalization and duodenal biopsies showing improved duodenitis. This study emphasizes the importance of considering medication history and ruling out other potential causes of enteropathy. Olmesartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist that is commonly prescribed for hypertension. However, in rare cases, it may induce enteropathy, which often remains underdiagnosed. This rare side effect may present as chronic diarrhea, weight loss, and signs of malabsorption. Interestingly, OIE presents with overlapping clinical and histopathological features to celiac disease and, therefore, may mislead physicians to an extensive diagnostic investigation. Greater awareness of medication-related diarrheal syndromes such as OIE should be promoted, given that simple discontinuation of the medication can lead to dramatic clinical improvement.

Single-Pill, Triple Antihypertensive Therapy in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: Preliminary Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, arterial hypertension is the foremost preventable and modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. In addition to lifestyle changes, recent international guidelines recommend single-pill, low-dose combinations as initial treatment strategy. We investigated whether this approach is feasible in a rural sub-Saharan Africa setting. METHODS: Diagnosis of hypertension was established over three sets of blood pressure measurements, performed according to the European Society of Hypertension recommendations by trained personnel, using a validated, automated, oscillometric device OMRON M7 IT-HEM-7322-E. In 98 individuals with arterial hypertension, a once-daily, single-pill combination of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide was prescribed at an appropriate dose. Patients were instructed on its administration and potential side effects and encouraged towards lifestyle modifications. The treatment regimen was adjusted, if needed, at each outpatient clinic scheduled after 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (aged 61 [53-70] years; median and interquartile range) strictly adhered to the treatment schedule, while 19 individuals (70 [65-80] years) dropped out. Blood pressure was < 140/90 mmHg after 4 weeks in 44 (56%), after 8 weeks in 62 (78%), after 12 weeks in 69 (87%), and after 16 weeks in 74 (94%) participants. Excellent tolerance was reported. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide real-life evidence that hypertension management with a once-daily, single-pill combination of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide as initial treatment is feasible and effective also in a rural sub-Saharan setting. Single-pill combinations should be made available also in rural and remote areas in low- and middle-income countries as a reliable first-line treatment strategy.

Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil­amlodipine besylate tablets (Sevikar®) in older patients with essential hypertension: Subgroup analysis from the Sevikar study.

Essential hypertension is a notable threat for the older (age, ≥65 years) population. However, to the best of our knowledge, a real-world study assessing olmesartan medoxomil-amlodipine besylate (OM-AML) tablets in older Chinese patients with essential hypertension has not been performed. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OM-AML tablets in these patients. A total of 463 older Chinese patients with essential hypertension treated with OM-AML (20/5 mg) tablets (Sevikar®) were analyzed in a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, real-world study. Seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) and seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) at baseline, and at week (W)4 and W8 after OM-AML tablet administration were measured. The mean ± standard error change of SeSBP/SeDBP was -10.3±0.8/-4.6±0.5 and -12.5±0.8/-5.6±0.5 mmHg at W4 and W8, respectively. At W4, 74.1 and 26.8% of patients achieved BP target according to the China and American Heart Association (AHA) criteria, while at W8, 78.0 and 38.7% of patients reached these BP targets accordingly. Finally, 76.5 and 80.5% of patients achieved BP response at W4 and W8, respectively. Furthermore, home-measured SeSBP and SeDBP were significantly decreased from W1 to W8 (both P<0.001). Additionally, the satisfaction of both patients and physicians was elevated at W8 compared with at W0 (both P<0.001). The medication possession rate from baseline to W4 and W8 was 95.5 and 92.5%. The most common drug-associated adverse events by system organ classes were nervous system disorder (4.5%), vascular disorder (2.8%), and general disorder and administration site conditions (2.6%), which were generally mild. In conclusion, OM-AML tablets may be considered effective and safe in lowering BP, enabling the achievement of guideline-recommended BP targets in older Chinese patients with essential hypertension.

Complexation of the Antihypertensive Drug Olmesartan with Zn: In Vivo Antihypertensive and Cardiac Effects.

This study is based on the premise that the application of chemical synthesis strategies to structurally modify commercial drugs by complexation with biometals is a valid procedure to improve their biological effects. Our purpose is to synthesize a compound with greater efficacy than the original drug, able to enhance its antihypertensive and cardiac pharmacological activity. Herein, the structure of the coordination compound of Zn(II) and the antihypertensive drug olmesartan, [Zn(Olme)(H2O)2] (ZnOlme), is presented. After 8 weeks of treatment in SHR male rats, ZnOlme displayed a better blood pressure-lowering activity compared with olmesartan, with a noticeable effect even in the first weeks of treatment, while ZnCl2 showed similar results than the control. ZnOlme also reduced left ventricle (LV) weight and left ventricle/tibia length ratio (LV/TL), posterior wall thickness (PWT), and intraventricular septum in diastole (IVSd) suggesting its potential to prevent LV hypertrophy. Besides, ZnOlme reduced interstitial fibrosis (contents of collagen types I and III, responsible for giving rigidity and promoting vascular elasticity, respectively). The recovery of heart function was also evidenced by fractional shortening (diastolic left ventricular/systolic left ventricular) diameter determinations. Furthermore, ZnOlme increased the antioxidant capacity and prevented cardiac oxidative stress: it enhanced the reduction of reactive oxygen species generation, exerted a significant decrease in lipid peroxidation and enhanced glutathione contents in heart tissues compared to the control, Zn, and olmesartan treatments. Our results demonstrate that continuous oral administration of ZnOlme causes a better antihypertensive effect and grants enhancement of cardioprotection through antioxidant activity, in combination with hemodynamic improvement.

Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil-amlodipine besylate tablet in Chinese patients with essential hypertension: A prospective, single-arm, multi-center, real-world study.

There lacks real-world study with a large sample size assessing olmesartan medoxomil-amlodipine besylate (OM-AML) tablet. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OM-AML tablet in patients with essential hypertension. Totally, 1341 patients from 36 medical centers with essential hypertension who took OM-AML (20/5 mg) tablet were analyzed in the current prospective, single-arm, multi-center, real-world study (SVK study). Seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) and seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) at baseline, week (W)4 and W8 were measured. The mean (±SE) change of SeSBP/SeDBP was -10.8 ± 0.4/-6.6 ± 0.3 mmHg at W4 and -12.7 ± 0.5/-7.6 ± 0.3 mmHg at W8, respectively. At W4, 78.8% and 29.0% patients achieved BP target by China and American Heart Association (AHA) criteria; at W8, 84.7% and 36.5% patients reached blood pressure (BP) target by China and AHA criteria, accordingly. Meanwhile, 80.2% and 86.4% patients achieved BP response at W4 and W8, respectively. Home-measured SeSBP and SeDBP decreased from W1 to W8 (both p < .001). Besides, patients' and physicians' satisfaction were elevated at W8 compared with W0 (both p < .001). The medication possession rate was 94.8% from baseline to W4 and 91.3% from baseline to W8. The most common drug-related adverse events were nervous system disorders (4.6%), vascular disorders (2.6%), and general disorders and administration site conditions (2.3%) by system organ class, which were generally mild and manageable. In conclusion, OM-AML tablet is one of the best antihypertensive agents in patients with essential hypertension.

The Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared to Olmesartan on the Blood Pressure and Glucolipid Metabolism in DM Patients with Primary Hypertension.

PURPOSE: Given the beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan on blood pressure generally, this study investigates its antihypertension effects in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with primary hypertension specifically, and the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on glycolipid metabolism. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, open-label, active-controlled study to compare the antihypertension effects of sacubitril/valsartan in DM individuals with primary hypertension. The primary end point was reduction in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline with sacubitril/valsartan vs. olmesartan at week 8. The secondary endpoints included the changes in diastolic blood pressure (DBP), daytime SBP/DBP, nighttime SBP/DBP, BP achievement (office sitting BP < 130/80 mmHg), and lipid profile. The trial was registered with chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2200066428) on Dec 22, 2022. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were included in the final analysis. SBP decreased to a greater extent in the sacubitril/valsartan group from baseline to 8 weeks [between-treatment difference: 3.51 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.41 to 6.62 mm Hg, P = 0.03]. Furthermore, more patients achieved the blood pressure goal with sacubitril/valasartan (74.60% vs. 54.70%, P = 0.03). Multiple logistical regression analysis showed that sacubitril/valsartan was associated with BP achievement [odds ratio (OR) 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.73, P = 0.007], but the difference in SBP, DBP, day time SBP/DBP, and night time SBP/DBP reduction did not approach statistical significance. HbA1C1, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were lower than baseline in both groups (P < 0.05); however, there was no difference in the effects on glucose and lipid metabolism from sacubitril/valsartan compared to olmesartan. CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril/valsartan not only provided superior BP reduction compared to olmesartan, it did so without adverse effects on glycemic control and lipid parameters in DM patients with primary hypertension.

Impact of Sex and Genetic Variation in Relevant Pharmacogenes on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Valsartan, Olmesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide.

Drug combination therapy is the most common pharmacological strategy for hypertension management. No pharmacogenetic biomarkers for guiding hypertension pharmacotherapy are available to date. The study population were 64 volunteers from seven bioequivalence trials investigating formulations with valsartan, olmesartan and/or hydrochlorothiazide. Every volunteer was genotyped for 10 genetic variants in different transporters' genes. Additionally, valsartan-treated volunteers were genotyped for 29 genetic variants in genes encoding for different metabolizing enzymes. Variability in pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum concentration (Cmax) and time to reach it (tmax), the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and blood pressure measurements were analyzed as a function of pharmacogenetic and demographic parameters. Individuals with the ABCB1 rs1045642 T/T genotype were associated with a higher valsartan tmax compared to those with T/G and G/G genotypes (p < 0.001, ß = 0.821, R2 = 0.459) and with a tendency toward a higher postural dizziness incidence (11.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.070). A higher hydrochlorothiazide dose/weight (DW)-corrected area under the curve (AUC∞/DW) was observed in SLC22A1 rs34059508 G/A volunteers compared to G/G volunteers (p = 0.050, ß = 1047.35, R2 = 0.051), and a tendency toward a higher postural dizziness incidence (50% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.063). Sex impacted valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide pharmacokinetics, showing a lower exposure in women, whereas no significant differences were found for olmesartan pharmacokinetics.

What do we know today about drug-induced microscopic colitis? A case of lymphocytic colitis on olmesartan.

Microscopic colitis is part of the differential diagnosis of chronic watery diarrhea. Colonoscopy discloses a normal looking mucosa, therefore its diagnosis is based on histology of colonic biopsies. Two main phenotypes are distinguished: collagenous colitis and lymphocytic colitis. A third entity, incomplete microscopic colitis or unspecified microscopic colitis has been reported in the literature. It affects preferentially women over 60 years of age and its association with certain drugs is increasingly established. In case of suspected drug-induced microscopic colitis, identification of the responsible drug is a key to management. After discontinuation of the suspected drug, the gold standard of treatment is budesonide both for induction and for maintenance in case of clinical relapse, as is often the case after discontinuation. Therapy with immunomodulators, biologics, or surgery is reserved for refractory forms of microscopic colitis after multidisciplinary consultation. Through the clinical case of colitis on olmesartan, we will review the latest recommendations on drug-induced microscopic colitis.

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of a Single-Pill Combination of Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide in Korean Patients with Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with hypertension and additional cardiovascular risk factors pose a challenge by requiring more intensive blood pressure (BP) control. Single-pill combination (SPC) therapy can benefit these patients by improving medication adherence. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter observational study assessed the real-world safety and effectiveness of an SPC containing olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide (O/A/H) in South Korean patients with hypertension and cardiovascular risk factors. BP control rates, defined as the percentage of patients achieving systolic BP (SBP) < 130 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) < 80 mmHg for intensive BP control, and < 140 mmHg and < 90 mmHg, respectively, for standard BP control, were investigated across various cardiovascular risk groups, along with changes in SBP and DBP from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: The most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor was age (≥ 45 years in men, ≥ 55 years in women, 86.1%), followed by cardiovascular diseases (64.4%), dyslipidemia (53.7%), body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 (53.5%), and diabetes mellitus (DM) (46.3%). Switching to O/A/H showed significant BP reduction, with a mean change of - 17.8 mmHg/- 9.3 mmHg in SBP/DBP within 4 weeks. The intensive BP control rate was 41.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.5, 43.4), and the standard BP control rate was 73.3% (95% CI 71.5, 75.1), with better control rates in the risk age group (43.1% and 74.1%, respectively) and cardiovascular disease group (42.0% and 73.8%, respectively). The DM group had relatively lower control rates (37.5% for intensive control and 69.4% for standard control). Common adverse drug reactions included dizziness (2.91%), hypotension (1.51%), and headaches (0.70%). CONCLUSION: The SPC therapy of O/A/H caused a rapid and sustained reduction in SBP/DBP in patients' hypertension and additional cardiovascular risk factors. The therapy was safe and well tolerated. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: KCT0003401 ( https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/20795 ).

Efficacy and Safety Comparative of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Olmesartan in the Treatment of hypertension: A Meta-analysis of RCTs.

BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is a widely used drug for hypertension in Asia, popular for its efficacy and safety. However, there has been no comprehensive literature review comparing it with olmesartan. This meta-analysis compared the antihypertensive and adverse effects of sacubitril/valsartan and olmesartan. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The data were then analyzed and processed using Revman 5.4 and Stata SE14 software. RESULTS: Six RCTs with 4,127 patients were identified, showing that LCZ696 had better blood pressure control than olmesartan; mean sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure, sitting pulse pressure, 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure, and 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure were significantly decreased with LCZ696 compared with olmesartan. No significant difference between LCZ696 and olmesartan was observed in the occurrence of the majority of adverse events, with a decreased probability of headache in patients with sacubitril/valsartan compared with olmesartan. The subgroup analysis showed treatment with 400 mg/d LCZ696 was better than olmesartan in reducing serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril/valsartan was better than olmesartan in controlling blood pressure in patients with hypertension, with relatively higher safety.

Exploring the Effectiveness and Safety of Azilsartan-Medoxomil/Chlorthalidone Versus Olmesartan-Medoxomil/Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertensive Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of azilsartan-medoxomil/chlorthalidone (AZI-M/CT) compared to olmesartan-medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide (OLM/HCTZ) in patients with hypertension. Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov, starting from their establishment until March 15, 2023. The purpose of these searches was to locate original reports that compare the effectiveness of AZI-M/CT and OLM/HCTZ in treating hypertension. Data on various characteristics at the beginning and end of the studies were gathered. The analyses were carried out using Review Manager 5.4.1 (The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014, Odense, Denmark) and STATA 16.0 software (Stata Corp. LP, College Station, TX, USA). Risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as part of the study. A total of 3,146 individuals from four separate investigations were included in the study, with 1,931 individuals receiving AZI-M/CT and 1,215 individuals receiving OLM/HCTZ. The combined analysis revealed that the average diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was significantly lower in the AZI-M/CT group compared to the OLM/HCTZ group (WMD -2.64 [-2.78, -2.51]; P = 0.00001; I2 = 1%). However, there were no significant differences in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP; WMD -2.95 [-6.64, 0.73]; P = 0). Furthermore, the AZI-M/CT group had a notably higher incidence of major adverse events (RR 1.58 [1.20, 2.08]; P = 0.001; I2 = 11%) and any treatment-emergent adverse events (RR 1.11 [1.03, 1.20]; P = 0.007; I2 = 51%). However, there was no significant difference in the mortality risk between the two groups (RR 0.74 [0.14, 3.91]; P = 0.72; I2 = 0%). Based on the results of our meta-analysis, AZI-M/CT is more effective than OLM/HCTZ at reducing blood pressure in elderly hypertensive patients. However, because of the small sample size, favorable results must be carefully reevaluated, and more studies are needed.

A Rare Case of Olmesartan-Associated Enteropathy Successfully Managed With Steroid Taper.

Olmesartan is a commonly used antihypertensive medication belonging to the class of angiotensin II receptor blockers. Though generally well-tolerated, olmesartan can rarely cause olmesartan-associated enteropathy (OAE) with non-bloody diarrhea, weight loss, abdominal pain, and vomiting. Patients may develop enteropathy months to years after drug initiation. In severe cases, patients may develop complications that require hospitalization. Diagnosis is often delayed due to unfamiliarity of OAE, nonspecific presenting symptoms, and normal-appearing gross endoscopic findings. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsy is essential to the diagnosis, showing sprue-like enteropathy with intestinal villous atrophy and mucosal inflammation. This report describes a case of a 70-year-old man who presented with three months of profuse watery diarrhea and 40-pound unintentional weight loss. After an extensive workup, including EGD with duodenal biopsies, the patient was diagnosed with OAE. The biopsies showed findings consistent with acute and chronic duodenitis, mucosal desquamation and ulceration, blunting of villi, and a sprue-like pattern with neutrophils. Celiac serologies and anti-enterocyte antibodies were negative, further supporting the diagnosis of OAE. Complete resolution of symptoms was achieved by discontinuing olmesartan and administering a steroid taper. Considering the frequent use of olmesartan, the increasing occurrence of OAE, and the wide range of associated symptoms, it is crucial for providers to recognize OAE and consider early discontinuation of olmesartan. This approach can help prevent further intestinal damage, protracted symptoms, unnecessary diagnostic tests, and financial burdens on both patients and the healthcare system.

Area under the curve and ratio difference spectrophotometric methods with evaluation of the greenness for simultaneous determination of olmesartan medoxomil and metoprolol succinate.

The aim of this study is to develop and validate two simple spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of metoprolol succinate (MET) and olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) in tablet form. Method (I) was area under the curve (AUC) method. This approach involved the measuring of the area over a variety of wavelengths. Two wavelength ranges; 213-230 nm and 244-266 nm were chosen for determination of MET and OLM, respectively. Method (II) was ratio difference spectrophotometricmethod. For determination of MET, the ratio spectra were generated using 15 µg/mL OLM as a divisor then the peak to trough amplitudes between 221 nm and 245 nm were displayed versus the corresponding concentrations of MET. For determination of OLM, the peak-to-peak amplitudes between 247 and 293 nm were chosen and found to be directly proportional to OLM concentrations using 15 µg/mL MET as a divisor. The linearity ranges were 2-30 µg/mL and 2-25 µg/mL for MET and OLM, respectively. The assay results showed good mean %recovery ± SD as well as good agreement with that of the reported method. The developed methods were validated according to ICH guidelines. The developed methods are accurate, precise, eco-friendly and could be applied successfully to estimate OLM and MET in their combined dosage form.

Olmesartan-Induced Enteropathy: A Case Report.

Patients with olmesartan-induced enteropathy, a rare illness, frequently endure prolonged diarrhea and weight loss with no apparent cause. Because this adverse event's clinical and histological characteristics mimic those of other small intestine illnesses, it can be challenging to recognize it in a timely manner. We report a case of olmesartan-induced enteropathy in a 58-year-old male who had been on olmesartan for several years. Recently, during his travel to Greece, he developed diarrhea lasting several weeks. This was accompanied by a significant weight loss of 35 lbs, acute kidney injury, and hypokalemia. Extensive negative workup, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with normal biopsy of esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and terminal ileum, and colonoscopy with biopsies, autoimmune serologies, and infectious disease workup, led to a diagnosis of olmesartan-induced enteropathy as a diagnosis of exclusion. Diarrhea improved/resolved within a few days after stopping olmesartan in our patient.

Olmesartan alleviates SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein induced renal fibrosis by regulating HMGB1 release and autophagic degradation of TGF-ß1.

Background and aims: Renal damage in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is highly associated with mortality. Finding relevant therapeutic candidates that can alleviate it is crucial. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) have been shown to be harmless to COVID-19 patients, but it remains elusive whether ACEIs/ARBs have protective benefits to them. We wished to determine if ACEIs/ARBs had a protective effect on the renal damage associated with COVID-19, and to investigate the mechanism. Methods: We used the envelope (E) protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) to induce COVID-19-like multiple organ damage and observed renal fibrosis. We induced the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of HK-2 cells with E protein, and found that olmesartan could alleviate it significantly. The protective effects of olmesartan on E protein-induced renal fibrosis were evaluated by renal-function assessment, pathologic alterations, inflammation, and the TGF-ß1/Smad2/3 signaling pathway. The distribution of high-mobility group box (HMGB)1 was examined after stimulation with E protein and olmesartan administration. Results: E protein stimulated HMGB1 release, which triggered the immune response and promoted activation of TGF-ß1/Smad2/3 signaling: both could lead to renal fibrosis. Olmesartan regulated the distribution of HMGB1 under E protein stimulation. Olmesartan inhibited the release of HMGB1, and reduced the inflammatory response and activation of TGF-ß1/Smad2/3 signaling. Olmesartan increased the cytoplasmic level of HMGB1 to promote the autophagic degradation of TGF-ß1, thereby alleviating fibrosis further. Conclusion: Olmesartan alleviates E protein-induced renal fibrosis by regulating the release of HMGB1 and its mediated autophagic degradation of TGF-ß1.

Twenty-Four-Hour Blood Pressure-Lowering Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Olmesartan in Japanese Patients With Essential Hypertension Based on Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping Status: A Post Hoc Analysis of Data From a Randomized, Double-Blind Multicenter Study.

Background Nighttime blood pressure (BP) and an abnormal nocturnal BP dipping profile are important cardiovascular risk factors in patients with hypertension. This post hoc analysis investigated the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on 24-hour BP in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension and in patient subgroups based on nocturnal BP dipping status. Methods and Results Data from a randomized clinical trial comparing the BP-lowering effects of 8 weeks of treatment with sacubitril/valsartan (200 or 400 mg/d) and olmesartan (20 mg/d) in Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were analyzed. The primary end point was change in 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime BP in patient subgroups based on nocturnal BP dipping status (dipper, nondipper). Six hundred thirty-two patients with baseline and follow-up ambulatory BP data were included. Both sacubitril/valsartan dosages reduced 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic BP, and 24-hour and daytime diastolic BP, to a significantly greater extent than olmesartan in the dipper and nondipper groups. However, between-group differences in nighttime systolic BP were more significant in the nondipper group (difference [95% CI] for sacubitril/valsartan 200 and 400 mg/d versus olmesartan 20 mg/d: -4.6 [95% CI, -7.3 to -1.8] and -6.8 [95% CI, -9.5 to -4.1] mm Hg, respectively; P<0.01 and P<0.001). Between-group differences in the BP control rate were greatest in the nondipper subgroup (systolic BP control rate of 34.4% and 42.6% with sacubitril/valsartan 200 and 400 mg/d versus 23.1% with olmesartan 20 mg/d). Conclusions This analysis highlights the value of sacubitril/valsartan therapy in patients with a nondipper profile of nocturnal BP and confirms this agent's potent 24-hour BP-lowering effect in Japanese populations with hypertension. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01599104.

Olmesartan-Induced Ischemic Enteritis Complicated With Bowel Perforation: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Olmesartan is a relatively new angiotensin receptor blocker used widely to control hypertension. Cases have been reported previously of enteropathy induced by olmesartan. Here, the authors report a case of olmesartan-induced ischemic enteritis complicated by bowel perforation. A 52-year-old male patient, during the treatment with olmesartan, developed severe abdominal pain of five-day duration. He underwent exploratory laparotomy for bowel perforation and surgical resection of the ischemic bowel segment. On a two-month follow-up after the discontinuation of olmesartan and the emergency surgery, the patient was symptom-free and functioning well. This rare report focuses on ischemic enteritis associated with olmesartan, describes the symptoms, and records the progression of this side effect and the corresponding treatment. Our case aims to raise awareness amongst physicians about the possibility of this severe complication and to point out that more research is still needed on its pathophysiology to better understand this drug.